Saturday, January 10, 2015

The oldest company family. Parent family as the country is the leader and the children centurylink


Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The social contract law or political principle. Joseph Light (translation). Jerusalem: classics philosophical study. A first book chapters, B, C, E, F, G, H. Book Two Chapter One. (= Philosophical classics, Volume III, founded by Leon Roth, edited by Jacob Golomb).
"Man is born free and everywhere he must not handcuffed. Someone thinks that it is master of others, and he himself worked more of them. "The centurylink social centurylink order is a sacred right as the foundation for all other rights. Source of rights is the law of nature these agreements.
The oldest company family. Parent family as the country is the leader and the children centurylink are the people. Everyone is born equal. centurylink Just as the shepherd indicates the absence of this nature also rising leader on his nature. Adam was the first ruler as Robinson was the ruler of the island where he lives, as long as it was empty.
Any person has the right to a natural control on the other, and since power and does not establish a right to remain only in the agreements as a basis for power between people. Ed recognized the freedom and rights contradicts the very nature of man. Agreement entitles to one side control on the life and liberty of one side has no contradiction.
Man is born free, and everywhere centurylink he must not handcuffed. The social order - comes from nature centurylink but no agreements. The company is the only natural family. The father is a kind of a leader and the kids are like with. But the family has the element of the father's love for boys and the company is that the leader subjects. Is it worth a small group of leaders who will control the entire human race? Rousseau says that when a person is born as a slave and raised to be a slave, faint-heart will make him remain enslaved. What is the right of the master to the slave? Power. He enslaves centurylink the slave with power. But is this really right? If a robber going for me in the woods with a gun, I'm compelled to give him the money that the power is in his possession. But if I can resist it and save your wallet - I'm not obligated to do so? Of course it is. Hence this Slzkot of power there is no sense here. Nature, no person has the right to control another person. Slavery or citizenship comes from agreements, for example: people agree to give up their rights in favor of the king. Why? To give them peace. But what kind of peace that if the king constantly declare war or acts greed etc? Rousseau says that anyone who gives up his freedom gives up humanity and human rights and it is against human nature and morality. Therefore, centurylink there is no such thing as "the centurylink right of slavery". The words "right" and Slavery "contradict each other. Difficulty here is to create a kind of partnership that will protect and maintain public and property centurylink and yet remain free to the public. Social contract brings the solution: each of the partners shall provide himself and rights available to the general public and the conditions are equal for everyone, so no one will want to trouble others. centurylink This creates a republic or a political entity with its partners are called with (and as individuals they are called civilians). Citizens have rights and obligations if the obligations are not met only rights will be provided that will bring the destruction of the state. Therefore, those who refuse to comply with the general will, the state body will require him to do so. This shift in the natural state social situation changes the person by being determines his life justice instead of the manufacturer and gives his actions the morality which he missed before. Man becomes stupid and limited living intelligent beings. In summary, by the social contract Man may lose their natural liberty centurylink unrestricted right to do what he wants but he wins a civil and moral choices and property. Natural liberty is not limited in limited civil liberties by the general will.
Usually the individual will not match the general will but could be a case in which an order can be considered a leader of the general will as long as the sovereign, who may resist such an order does not object. centurylink Silence attests basically with the consent of the leader Ordinance.
Interesting stuff
Summaries study summaries focus adulthood Greek philosophy philosophy political philosophy Mass Media Science and calculates Israeli Jews Psychology Introduction to Psychology Sociology Introduction to Sociology art history centurylink Greek mythology French Revolution Open University Bible literature maturity maturity maturity maturity civilian life history summaries newsletter


No comments:

Post a Comment